It's an arch comment, sure. Pradeep Mehta of the CUTS Centre for International Trade, Economy and the Environment, made it when suggesting that money spent in the U.S. on liposuction to remove the fatty deposits of excess consumption should instead go to aid the victims of famine.
Mehta was hitting back at U.S. claims that India's economic growth, like that of China, is to fault for the effects of resource depletion being felt around the world. That blame followed the news last week that big box stores had started rationing rice. Mehta also pointed our that if Americans ate at the rate of middle-class Indians, “many
hungry people in sub-Saharan Africa would find food on their plates.”
Of course, many might argue instead that if the American middle class ate less, then it would instead convert the spare biomass into ethanol for its SUVs. But that's not the point. Instead, we do need to take a look at our willingness to blame others for our modern maladies, both real and perceived. Is our over-consumption the fault of the ads that surround us? Of the corporations that place them? Of the plastic surgeons who seek to benefit by sucking out the excess?
Just as America needs to look at its own problems before blaming India and China, individuals need to bring order to their own before blaming society. Each of us needs to resist the notion that we can only be more by owning more, that wrinkles equal sickness, that size zero should be our monolithic ideal.
So take a good long look at yourself. And love what you see. Then start thinking about what we can do collectively.